(I apologise if this post is a little short, but I really don’t think any more needs to be said on this issue.)
The
oxford dictionary refers to ‘Opinion’ as: “A belief or judgment that rests on
grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.” So, an opinion is just a
thing with little justification that gets thrown out there to be devoured by
anyone with actual logic, and played around with by those with none.
The
phrase “in my opinion” might as well be replaced with: “speaking from a biased,
flawed, unjustified standpoint taken directly from my rectum...”
Debates
should be contain at least one factual view, followed by a conclusion drawn
from said facts. Eg: “America has the most high-school shootings in any
first-world nation, and the only similarity between each shooting is that the
person responsible for the shooting has access to guns – therefore, gun control
is needed NOW.”
It’s fair
enough to say: “therefore, my opinion is that gun control is needed NOW” because
the opinion is based on fact. But if it’s fact then there’s no need to
undermine it with opinion. Why not just say what you conclude, and if there is
a flaw or disagreement in the conclusion then the other people debating will
point it out.
‘Opinion’
has become like ‘literally’ – a meaningless buzzword inserted into a banal
sentence to make that sentence seem less banal. For the next episode of Question Time, they should install
chairs that drop the occupant down into an enclosure of tigers if s/he says “in
my opinion.”
No comments:
Post a Comment